Who is the Bully? You Decide!

Today’s Broadcast

Is Europe or Islam the Aggressor?

Amnesty International says Europeans Mistreat Muslims – Are Muslims the Victims or the Aggressors?

 

Early this year, AI (Amnesty International) produced a 123 page report charging Europe as Bullies against Muslims.

Soren Kearns gives an excellent well documented reply to this bogus report.  It seems that AI is now the

 

A new report from Amnesty International lashes out at “widespread discrimination” against Muslims in Europe. The report directs particular ire at laws banning Muslim veils in public spaces, and excoriates European politicians for helping to “foster a climate of hostility and suspicion against people perceived as Muslim.”

Amnesty International omits, however, all instances of discrimination initiated by Muslims against Christians and others in Europe who have taken them in, and who may well feel dismayed by what might be seen as an escalating procession of Muslim demands, threats and attacks.

The report also fails to explain why growing numbers of Europeans are increasingly skeptical about Muslim immigration; it also fails to mention that in country after country, Europeans have been going out of their way to afford Muslims special benefits, rights, privileges and provisions that do not apply to native-born Europeans, and that are establishing the Muslim population as an entitled class in European society.

The 123-page study, “Choice and Prejudice: Discrimination Against Muslims in Europe,” says that “Muslims in Europe face discrimination in several areas of life because of their religion,” and this “blights their individual prospects, opportunities and self-esteem and can result in isolation, exclusion and stigmatization.”

It continues, “Discrimination against Muslims in Europe is fuelled by stereotypes and negative views;” and calls on European politicians to “adopt a more rational approach” and stop portraying Islam “as a system of values which denies gender equality or a violent ideology.”

Amnesty International, perhaps welded to notions political correctness, also further fails to mention actions by Muslims themselves that might well have been responsible for fuelling the “stereotypes and negative views” that it accuses Europeans of having.

Consider Belgium, where radical Muslims have launched a propaganda and intimidation campaign aimed at turning the country into an Islamic state. Muslim neighborhoods in Brussels — the so-called capital of Europe — have already become “no-go” zones for Belgian police officers, who are often pelted with rocks by Muslim youths.

In Britain, hundreds of Muslim children every year are subjected to forced marriages. In England and Wales, more than 65,000 Muslim women and girls have been the victims of female genital mutilation, and another 24,000 girls under the age of 15 are believed to be at a high risk.

Also in Britain, tens of thousands of Muslim immigrants are practicing bigamy or polygamy, possibly at times to collect larger social welfare payments from the British state. At the same time, radical Muslims have launched a campaign to turn twelve British cities, including London, into independent Islamic “emirates” to be ruled by Islamic Sharia law.

In Denmark, Muslim criminal street gangs have taken over large parts of Danish towns and cities; in Copenhagen, some suburbs have also been transformed into “no-go” zones, off limits to non-Muslims. Meanwhile, over the past decade, the number of Muslim immigrants living on social welfare benefits in Denmark has increased almost ten-fold.

In France, where there are now more practicing Muslims than practicing Roman Catholics, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones , also off-limits to non-Muslims apparently because they are too dangerous; in these French “no-go” zones over which the French state has lost control, an estimated five million Muslims currently reside.

In Germany, thousands of Muslim women and children are the victims of forced marriage every year. At the same time, Islamic Sharia courts are operating in all major German cities, and German authorities say they are “powerless” to do anything about them.

In the Netherlands, nearly half of Moroccan immigrants in the country between the ages of 12 and 24 have been arrested, fined, charged or otherwise accused of committing a crime during the past five years.

Further, as Islamic legal tradition holds that dogs are “unclean” animals, a Dutch Muslim politician in The Hague, the third-largest city in Holland, has recently called for a ban on dogs in the city.

In Italy, Muslims have been commandeering the Piazza Venezia in Rome for public prayers; and in Bologna, Muslims have repeatedly threatened to bomb the San Petronio cathedral because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inspired by Dante’s Inferno that depicts Mohammed being tormented in Hell.

In Spain, a high school teacher in the city of La Línea de la Concepción was sued by the parents of a Muslim student who said the teacher “defamed Islam” by talking about Spanish ham in a geography class. And a discotheque in southern Spanish resort town of Águilas (Murcia) was forced to change its name and architectural design under duress after Islamists threatened to initiate “a great war between Spain and the people of Islam” if it did not.

Elsewhere in Spain, Muslim immigrants were accused of poisoning dozens of dogs in the city of Lérida, where 29,000 Muslims now make up around 20% of the city’s total population; again, according to local residents, as dogs are considered “unclean.” In the northeastern Spanish region of Catalonia, Muslims have deployed “morals police” to ensure that practicing and non-practicing Muslims comply with Islamic Sharia law.

In Switzerland, an immigrant group based in Bern said it wants the emblematic white cross to be removed from the Swiss national flag because as a Christian symbol it “no longer corresponds to today’s multicultural Switzerland.” Further, leading Islamic groups in the country announced that they want to establish a “parallel parliament” so that all of the country’s Muslims can “speak with one voice.” Based in Basel, the new parliament would straightforwardly operate according to Islamic Sharia law.

These developments in Europe have been occurring during just the last eight years in addition to, of course, the bombing by Muslims of commuter trains in Spain in March 2004; the bombing of public transportation in London in July 2005; the attempted bombing of the Glasgow airport in June 2007; the attempted bombing of the Barcelona metro in January 2008; the attempted bombing of several US-bound airplanes, including that of the “shoe bomber” Richard Reid in December 2009; mass riots caused by the reprinting of the “Mohammed Cartoons” in Denmark in 2005 and 2006; Muslim riots in Malmö, Sweden in December 2008 and in Strasbourg, France in June 2010; and Muslim threats to mobilize 10,000 demonstrators onto the streets of London to prevent a democratically elected member of a European government, MP Geert Wilders of the Netherlands, from entering Britain in February 2009; and Muslim attacks on German police in May 2012.

Muslims in Europe also murdered the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh in January 2004; tortured and murdered the French Jew, Ilam Halimi in January 2006; attacked the Swedish artist Lars Vilkes in July 2007; tried to murder the Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard in January 2010; killed French servicemen and Jews in March 2012; and attacked Spanish politician Josep Anglada in April 2012.

Muslims in Europe have also been attempting to muzzle free speech, including by “lawfare,” the malicious use of costly court trials to intimidate Europeans into silence to shut down the discussion of Islam. In the last few years, Muskims have initiated trials against Geert Wilders in the Netherlands; Suzanne Winter and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff in Austria; Lars Hedegaard and Jesper Langballe in Denmark; Jussi Kristian Halla-aho in Finland; Brigitte Bardot, Michel Houellebecq, and Marie Laforêt in France; and Gregorius Nekschot in the Netherlands;

Muslim gangs have also been found responsible for “Rape Waves” in Britain, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway and Sweden.

Although Amnesty International lists in its report a litany of “discriminatory experiences” faced by Muslims in Europe, it does not acknowledge that most European countries have granted their Muslims minorities a host of special privileges, all in the name of multiculturalism, and that Muslim values are increasingly influencing European public policymaking.

In Belgium, for example, the government now pays the wages of more than 200 imams in 100 mosques in a bid to end discrimination against Islam. At the same time, dozens of Christian churches are being turned into mosques as Muslims demand more places to worship.

In Antwerp, the second-largest city in Belgium, an Islamic Sharia law court is now mediating family law disputes for Muslim immigrants. The self-appointed Muslim judges running the court are applying Islamic law — rather than the secular Belgian Family Law system — to resolve disputes involving questions of marriage and divorce, child custody and child support, as well as all inheritance-related matters.

 

In Britain, the largest university in London plans to ban the sale of alcohol on campus to accommodate the “cultural sensitivity” of its Muslim students; and the British Broadcasting Corporation admits that it treats Islam with more “protection and sensitivity” than Christianity.

The British Girl Scout Association has designed new uniforms for Muslim students who had “issues” with the existing range of clothing. Across Britain, municipal swimming pools are being closed to the general public to host Muslim women-only sessions.

In British courts, Muslim defendants are frequently the beneficiaries of favorable judicial treatment which does not apply to British defendants.

In Denmark, primary schools will soon begin teaching Islam to all students in the first grade.

In France, all of the slaughterhouses in the greater Paris metropolitan area are now producing all of their meat in accordance with Islamic Sharia law. France 2 television reports that much of the religiously slaughtered meat known as halal is not labeled as such and is entering the general food chain, where it is being unwittingly consumed by the non-Muslim population.

In German courts, judges are increasingly citing the Koran in civil divorce cases that involve Muslims. Muslim employees in German supermarkets are now exempt from handling alcohol on religious grounds. Municipal authorities in towns and cities across Germany have agreed to allow Muslim girls to wear “burkinis” in public swimming pools.

The city of Mannheim is planning to rename a Muslim-majority neighborhood, giving it a Turkish name. At the same time, German taxpayers are paying for four new Islamic theology departments in Tübingen, Münster/Osnabrück, Erlangen/Nürnberg and Frankfurt/Gießen, at a total cost of €20 million ($25 million) to train Muslim imams and Islamic religion teachers.

 

While Amnesty International has put the entire onus for “Islamophobia” on non-Muslims, nowhere does it call on Muslims to accept responsibility — not only for problems brought about by the refusal of Muslims to adopt the values of the majority, but also for their efforts to displace these values with their own.

As the Dutch politician Pym Fortuyn put it in a television interview the day before he was killed for criticizing the rise of Islam in Holland, “I think the guests are trying to take over the house.”

 

Today’s Broadcast

 

Today I interview Tom Trento from The United West

He reveals how the Obama administration has given $1.5 billion to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
 

 

 

Islam and Paedophilia

Today’s Broadcast

MOHAMMAD’S SEXUALITY WITH LITTLE GIRLS

Mohammad’s Marriage to Aisha.

He Formed a contract of marriage with her when she was six but consummated the marriage when she was nine.

From the Buhkari Haddiths

Narrated Aisha: The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234

Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13) Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151

   From the Sahih Muslim Haddiths

 ’A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house at the age of nine. She further said: We went to Medina and I had an attack of fever for a month, and my hair had come down to the earlobes. Umm Ruman (my mother) came to me and I was at that time on a swing along with my playmates. She called me loudly and I went to her and I did not know what she had wanted of me. She took hold of my hand and took me to the door, and I was saying: Ha, ha (as if I was gasping), until the agitation of my heart was over. She took me to a house, where had gathered the women of the Ansar. They all blessed me and wished me good luck and said: May you have share in good. She (my mother) entrusted me to them. They washed my head and embellished me and nothing frightened me. Allah’s Messenger (, may peace be upon him) came there in the morning, and I was entrusted to him. Book 8, Number 3309.

‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old. Book 8, Number 3310

‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old. Book 8, Number 3311

  From the  Sunan Dawud Haddiths

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin: The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr’s version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.  Book 41, Number 4915:

Narrated AbuUsamah: The tradition mentioned above (No. 4915) has also been transmitted by AbuUsamah in a similar manner through a different chain of narrators. This version has: “With good fortune. ” She (Umm Ruman) entrusted me to them. They washed my head and redressed me. No one came to me suddenly except the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) in the forenoon. So they entrusted me to him.  Book 41, Number 4916:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin: When we came to Medina, the women came to me when I was playing on the swing, and my hair were up to my ears. They brought me, prepared me, and decorated me. Then they brought me to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and he took up cohabitation with me, when I was nine. Book 41, Number 4917

 

Mohammad was dreaming about Marrying Aisha when she was 4 or 5 yrs. Old.

Bukhari :: Book 5 :: Volume 58 :: Hadith 235

Narrated ‘Aisha:

That the Prophet said to her, “You have been shown to me twice in my dream. I saw you pictured on a piece of silk and some-one said (to me). ‘This is your wife.’ When I uncovered the picture, I saw that it was yours. I said, ‘If this is from Allah, it will be done.”

Bukhari :: Book 5 :: Volume 58 :: Hadith 236

Narrated Hisham’s father:

Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

Note:  The time line -  “two years or so”.   This is reference to the preceding Haddith that Mohammad had dreams about Aishsa about two years or so before his contract of marriage with her.  The contract of marriage was made when she was six years old, so he was dreaming about her when she was around 4 years of age.

 

 Mohammad rebukes a follower for marrying a Matron – someone who is not a virgin. 

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: When I got married, Allah’s Apostle said to me, “What type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron’ He said, “Why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s Apostle said, “Why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?’ Sahih Al-Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 17.

 

Mohammad desires a Baby crawling on the floor.

(Suhayli, ii. 79: In the riwaya of Yunus I. I. recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lFadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’  But he died before she grew up and Sufyan b. al-Aswad b. ‘Abdu’l-Asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him Rizq and Lubab…1

1 Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah, Translated by A. Guillaume, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, (Re-issued in Karachi, Pakistan, 1967, 13th impression, 1998) 1955, p. 311.

 

Modern Scholars Teachings.

Dr. Ahmad Al Mu’bi on Memri TV & LBC TV – June 19, 2008

A Saudi Marriage Official

“There is no minimal age for entering marriage.  You can have a marriage contract even with a one year old girl.  This is merely a contract (indicating) consent.

But is the girl ready for sex yet or not?  What is the appropriate age for having sex for the first time?  This varies according to environment and traditions.  I Yemen, girls are married off at 9, 10, 8 or 13.  While in other countries they are married off at 16.

The Prophet Mohammad is the model we follow.  He took Aisha to be his wife when she was six, but he had sex with her only when she was 9.”

 

French Muslims Control Presidentail Election

Today’s Broadcast

This is a Testament to the Power Muslims have in Europe

 

From a study done in France, 93% of the 2 million voting Muslims cast their vote for Hollande.  This would give him around 1.7 million votes.  He won over Sarkozy by 1.3 million votes.  This means that the vast number of Muslims in France have the power to pick their own president.

As the West earns a living to buy their toys, the Muslims are earning a living to grow their families.  I have reported many times about this.  The average indigenous British family will have only 1.4 children.  The average British Muslim family will have 4.7 children.  In France they will have 7.4 children.

Islam is a patient enemy.  They know in time they will out vote us in the elections so they can vote who they like and the laws they like.  They will empower themselves to bring in Shariah laws and Muslims leaders.

 

We have seen the writing on the wall for some time that this day will come.  It has arrived and we will only have ourselves to blame for doing nothing for so long.

 

Other News:  Kansas Passes Anti- Shariah Bill

 

This is good news.  We in North America are starting to make a stand to keep Shariah out.  However, this means that only 4 out of 50 States have protected themselves against Shariah.  There is much work to do.

 

(TOPEKA, Kan.) — A bill designed to prevent Kansas courts or government agencies from making decisions based on Islamic or other foreign legal codes has cleared the state Legislature after a contentious debate about whether the measure upholds American values or appeals to prejudice against Muslims.

The Senate approved the bill Friday on a 33-3 vote. The House had approved it, 120-0, earlier in the week. The measure goes next to Republican Gov. Sam Brownback, who hasn’t said whether he’ll sign or veto the measure.

The measure doesn’t specifically mention Shariah law, which broadly refers to codes within the Islamic legal system. Instead, it says that courts, administrative agencies or state tribunals can’t base rulings on any foreign law or legal system that would not grant the parties the same rights guaranteed by state and U.S. constitutions.

But several supporters specifically cited the potential use of Shariah law in Kansas as their concern. Though there are no known cases in which a Kansas judge has based a ruling on Islamic law, supporters of the bill cited a pending case in Sedgwick County in which a man seeking to divorce his wife has asked for property to be divided under a prenuptial agreement in line with Shariah law.

The bill’s supporters said it simply ensures that legal decisions will protect long-cherished liberties, such as freedom of speech and religion and the right to equal treatment under the law. Sen. Susan Wagle, a Wichita Republican, said a vote for the legislation is a vote to protect women.

“In this great country of ours and in the state of Kansas, women have equal rights,” Wagle said during the Senate’s debate. “They stone women to death in countries that have Shariah law.”

The bill passed both chambers by wide margins because even some legislators who were skeptical of it believed it was broad and bland enough that it didn’t represent a specific political attack on Muslims.

“We don’t have any intolerance in this bill. Nobody’s stripped of their freedom of religion,” said Sen. Ty Masterson, an Andover Republican. “This is talking about the law — American law, American courts.”

But several senators noted that supporters of the bill have singled out Shariah law in talking about it.

“This bill will put Kansas in a light that says we are intolerant of any other faith,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Tim Owens, an Overland Park Republican who voted against the bill. “I would not be able to look at myself in the mirror in the morning if I didn’t stand up and say I don’t want to be that kind of person and I don’t want to be in a community or a state that is that way.”

Both the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the National Conference of State Legislatures say anti-Shariah proposals have been considered in 20 states, including Kansas. Oklahoma voters approved a ballot initiative in 2010 that specifically mentioned Shariah law, but both a federal judge and a federal appeals court blocked it.

“It is an effort to demonize Islam,” said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Washington-based council. “As Muslims are seen participating in a positive way in society, that really irritates some people.”

In Kansas, 45 House members, led by Rep. Peggy Mast, an Emporia Republican sponsored a bill aimed at Shariah law last year. The House approved it overwhelmingly, but it stalled in the Senate; this year, the House pushed another version, and pressure built on senators.

Mast had a news conference Thursday to highlight the Sedgwick County case, in which Hussein Hamdeh, a Wichita State University physics professor, filed for a divorce in November 2010 from his wife, Hala. Their prenuptial agreement, in keeping with Islamic law, promised her a $5,000 payment should they split, which he argued settled property issues.

Hussein Hamdeh’s attorney declined to comment because the case is pending. Hala Hamdeh’s attorney did not return a telephone message seeking comment.

Sen. Garrett Love, a Montezuma Republican, said even if no Kansas court has yet based a decision on foreign legal codes, “That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t still protect Kansans from those foreign laws being used in the future — a future that really may not be that far away.”

But several senators questioned whether the legislation is necessary, arguing Kansas judges and officials already must adhere to the U.S. and state constitutions. Hooper derided it as “an anti-unicorn” bill.

“All it does is increase hostility toward Islam and suspicion of Muslims,” Hooper said.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2114676,00.html#ixzz1uqquzagr

 

Fortress of Faith Story

Today’s Broadcast

 

As we have a number of new listeners, it is helpful for me to fill people in on the how this ministry got started.

Also, today I reveal something I have not shared on any broadcast…. how we got the name ‘Fortress of Faith.’

 

Today’s Broadcast

 

This is a repeat of an earlier broadcast.  Click here to read the notes

The Command to Deceive Non-Muslims – Part 3

Today’s Broadcast

Sorry for not getting this posted earlier today.  We have had some issues with the internet today.

This is a repeat broadcast.  Here are the notes for that broadcast.

 

The Command to Deceive Non-Muslims – Part 2

Today’s Broadcast

This is a repeat Broadcast of Nov 29, 2010.  Click here to read my notes

 

Today’s Broadcast

 

This is a repeat Broadcast -The notes for this broadcast are found here

The Doctrine of Al-Taqiyya (Deception)

Islamaphobia Conference in Washington

Today’s’ Broadcast

Radical Muslim Speaks at Western University in Bellingham

There is a new Pro-Islam group formed in Bellingham, WA, the home town of Fortress of Faith.  They are called “Confronting Islamaphobia in Whatcom County.  Click here to see their website.

 

They had a meeting yesterday, Sunday May 6, and invited controversial speaker Jafa (Jeff) Siddiqui to discuss Islamaphobia in America and Whatcom County.  Shockling, the steering committee for this Pro-Islam group are a number of Christian churches in Bellingham, WA the local Planned Parenthood.  Some Christian Churches held special services yesterday to recognize “Our shared history as children of Abraham, Hagar, and Sarah.“   This is beginning process of Chrislam entering Churches in Bellingham.

I was not able to attend this meeting as I am currently on the East coast, but some friends of mine attended and give the following report:

Approx. 100 or so people in attendance
19 or so accepted the invitation for “calling of prayer”
Clearly the intent was to draw no line of distinction between theologies. Anyone who was present was invited to join the Muslim call to prayer but none of the Muslims invited the “Christians” who were present to pray. In other words you’re invited to join us and submit to doing things our way but we’re not going to do the same. I thought we were all worshiping the same God and if so then how can our way of prayer be any less welcome.
 No one objected when one of the men who was praying stated afterwards that they were all simply slaves and that Allah is their master.
The speaker, Mr. Siddiqui, stated that Allah has a “crazy sense of humor” and that he often “places people out on a limb only to jerk the limb out from underneath them” clearly implying that God is humored by our stumbling.
Sincere joy is an expression clearly visible on the faces of those who have accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior and often present on many faces most of us encounter in good Godly Biblical New Testament churches. Based on statements made by the Muslims that were present, they pray five times a day to a god that has a crazy sense of humor, who laughs when they stumble from the places that he has placed them in simply because they are slaves and he is their master Needless to say I was not surprised to notice the lack of sincere joy on the faces of the Muslims in the crowd.
Mr. Siddiqui also spent a majority of his time stating that misguided fear was the cause of Islamaphobia in America today only to appear to be instilling/encouraging fear or distrust in most if not all of the branches of the United States Military and every form of law enforcement including the FBI. Stating that they were simply products of improper training and that the worldwide acts of terror that many countries deal with today are nothing more than “isolated incidents.” Mr. Siddiqui then used isolated instances, such as the Ft. Hood shooting and the recent shootings in Afghanistan, as clear evidence that Islamaphobia is a serious problem.
I couldn’t help but come to the conclusion that Mr. Siddiqui’s intent may have been to redirect any fear that people may have towards Muslims back at our own citizens, law enforcement, and government elected officials. “We’re not bringing leadership to our leaders,” he said, implying what? Leaders in other countries may be little more than puppets submissive to mob rule, but in the United States we elect representatives to lead according to individual conscience within the limits of the US Constitution.
 The nonstop and repetitious slide presentation was full of the same isolated incidents and material removed from its proper context that Mr. Siddiqui was trying to speak out against and he was using his examples as the basis for his argument.
Mr. Siddiqui mocked the idea of asking Muslims elected to the US Congress to swear an oath but then applauded asking a US Representative to sign a similar agreement!
Mr. Siddiqui spoke in circles throughout his presentation and used the very same fear tactics and misrepresentation of information in support of his argument while criticizing those of the opposition for doing the same.
Are fear tactics used to manipulate people? Sure
Do Muslims deserve the same religious freedoms that other citizens enjoy? Absolutely
Is it our duty to always hold our elected officials accountable? Most certainly
Does every Muslim desire to kill me? No

Is there any cause for fear of Muslims in America? We don’t have to fear Muslims wanting to be a part of the US but it is their obvious and sincere desire for the US to be a part of Islam by not assimilating into our culture or submitting themselves to the legal system that they decided to live under.

Submitted: DC

 

To find out some facts about Islamaphobia, look at the categories on the Right column and also look at the article I wrote in our Spring Newsletter – America is not hostile to Islam

 

 Page 1 of 28  1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last »