Western Civilization is a product of Christian Culture. Culture is the make of a peoples beliefs, actions and morals. Islam views Western culture as man-made and evil. Therefore, they are duty bound to STRUGGLE (Jihad) against it. The Muslim Brotherhood has made it their mission to destroy Western Civilzation from within. To sabatoge it and destroy what they call “our miserable house.”
This Summer, I plan to release my booklet – The Cultural Jihad – Islam’s assault on Western Civilization. This week, I am covering some of the material you will find documented in the book. We also have a CD that can be purchased with the book.
In previous blogs I have posted information on Jihad and the Barbary Pirates.
Christian worker loses her job after being ‘targeted’ by Islamic extremists
A Christian worker has launched a landmark legal action after she lost her job when she blew the whistle on what she says was a campaign of “race hate” by fundamentalist Muslims.
This is a replay of my first broadcast that was aired on February, 2011. I have edited it slightly to be replayed for today. I am taking this day off and will back on Monday to continue the Isaac / Ishmael Family Feud.
By the way, the information I cover in today’s broadcast will be in my booklet entitled, The Cultural Jihad – Islam’s assault on Western Civilization. I have put that book on the back shelf for the time being but I hope to release sometime in 2013.
God bless and have a great weekend.
Islamist Suspected for the Attack
There have been plenty of reports about Cyber attacks from Islamist on US banking systems over the past two weeks or so. The Hackers have not been able to breach the firewalls that protect sensitive data, however, they have been able to disturb the operation of banks websites.
We believe that we were attacked yesterday and it is likely that Islamist would try to shut us down. However, we are back online and have beefed up our security. Thankfully we were able to back up all our content and everything seems to be in order. It appears that nothing on our site was actually corrupted but the server that host our site was off line for about 24 hours or more.
We appreciate your support and willingness to help. God bless you all and thank you for your prayers.
Please Note: This broadcast is only going to be online for 24 hours. We do not feel comfortable leaving this online. However, if you wish to purchase all three interviews you can call (800) 716-9272. The coast is $15 which includes shipping.
We have distorted the voice of my guest for his protection as he lifts the veil on what is happening in one of America’s major cities, The Motor Capital, Detroit.
Today we talk about the common practice of Imam’s sex with virgins in Detroit and different forms of Jihad being practiced against America.
Listen To Today’s Broadcast Here
Paul Fields was removed from his position by the Tulsa Police Department because he refused to obey orders that would violate his conscience and his Constitutional rights.
I have been keeping my eye on this story and I recently received an email from the Thomas More Law Association who is providing assistance to defend Mr. Fields for his courageous stand for his rights.
Here is the Email:
Court Asked to Enter Judgment in Favor of Tulsa Police Captain Paul Fields in Mosque Controversy
Yesterday, attorneys representing Tulsa Police Captain Paul Fields filed a motion in an Oklahoma Federal District Court for entry of a partial judgment in his favor on the issue of liability. The Federal lawsuit involved the disciplinary action taken against Captain Fields after he refused orders to attend a Mosque event because it conflicted with his Christian faith and had nothing to do with any official police function. He also told his superiors that he would not require any of his subordinates to follow the order if they shared similar religious convictions.
Before he disobeyed the order to attend the Mosque event, Captain Fields met with his superiors and explained to them why he felt it was an unlawful order which he could not in good conscience obey.
Although dubbed “Law Enforcement Appreciation Day” it had nothing to do with official police business. It was a staged propaganda event to proselytize and use uniformed police officers as props. The Mosque’s plan: photograph officers in the mosque eating and socializing with Muslim leaders for the media and their website. All of this would establish the mosque’s credibility in the community despite its terrorist ties.
The event was scheduled for Friday, March 4, 2011— the “holy day” for Islam. According to the mosque’s promotional flyer, the event was to include: a tour of the mosque, observing a “weekly prayer service,” lectures on Islamic “beliefs”, and meetings with the local Muslim leadership.
The mosque showed its true colors. A week before the March 4th event, it hosted a dinner and speech by Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. In 1992, Wahhaj told a Muslim audience in New Jersey. “If only Muslims were more clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.”
In another sermon, Wahhaj said: “In time, this so-called democracy will crumble, and there will be nothing, and the only thing that will remain will be Islam.”
On June 9, 2011, Captain Paul Fields, a 18-year police veteran with a sterling record, was stripped of his command, suspended without pay and prohibited from being promoted for one year—a career busting punishment. His offense: He disobeyed the order to attend the Tulsa Mosque event.
The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, teamed up Captain Fields’ local Tulsa attorney to defend and advance his constitutional rights to the free exercise of religion.
Erin Mersino, trial counsel with the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) and one of the attorneys handling the case, commented:“This lawsuit is about a Christian who is standing up and saying he does not want to do something that violates his conscience.”
Police Major Julie Harris, Fields’ immediate superior, presented compelling sworn deposition testimony in his favor. It is prominently mentioned in the motion for Partial Summary Judgment. She testified:
- The Tulsa Police Department retaliated against Fields for exercising his constitutional rights.
- Fields had the right to object to the order to attend the Mosque because of his deeply held religious beliefs.
- Fields was punitively transferred for invoking his constitutional rights.
- There was no need for Fields to attend the Mosque if he had a religious conviction against doing so and there was no crime to investigate.
- Fields was the top performing shift commander in his division.
- Fields’ punishment was inconsistent with other similarly situated officers of his rank
- The allegations of the Internal Investigation of Fields could not be sustained.
TMLC is heavily involved in litigation defending the religious freedom of Christians as well as countering the infiltration of radical Muslims in America.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Law Center, commented: “The Tulsa, Oklahoma Police Department, of all places, has succumbed to the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence operations, their Civilization Jihad. I seriously doubt that a police chief would ever have ordered a Muslim officer to attend a Christian prayer service. And I’m positive that had the officer refused to attend, he would not have been punished.”
Indoctrination of our youth in public school textbooks.
While Christianity is being kicked out of the public school, Islam is making its way in and the ACLU is giving a blind eye to it.
A four year study of 38 text books and sources have been researched by Act for America. Their 230 page full report and 32 page Summary have been published exposing the falsification and revisionism of our textbooks.
DOWNLOAD OR READ:
Act for America says “Since the mid-1990′s, the number of units devoted to Islam in world history textbooks has significantly increased while the number of pages allocated to Judaism and Christianity has conspicuously decreased.” “What’s more the predominant place given to Islam in these textbooks highlights the issue of proselytization in the classroom…”
In the effort to be politically correct and to appease minority groups, the British Government is now working to ban one of Britain’s long standing religious icons – the Cross. For the best part of two thousand years, the cross has been the religious symbol for that island. Another shock is that it is the Conservative Party that is pledging to ban the Cross from the work place.
According to the Telegraph, ministers will fight a case at the European Court of Human Rights in which two British women will seek to establish their right to display the cross. The ministers will argue that because it is not a “requirement” of the Christian faith, employers can ban the wearing of the cross and sack workers who insist on doing so.
Back in December, I interviewed Paul Diamond, UK’s top human rights barrister. He handled the case for two Christian ladies who were fired from their jobs. They were fired because they wore a small cross on a necklace at work. Mrs Eweida, a British Airways employee refused to take off the cross which her employers claimed breached BA’s uniform code. She is a Coptic Christian who argued that BA allowed members of other faiths to wear religious garments and symbols. The religious garments were the hijab, which is what Muslim women wear. Mr. Diamond also represented Mrs Chaplin, 56, from Exeter, who was barred from working on hospital wards after she refused to hide the cross she wore on a necklace chain, this was the end of her 31 years of nursing.
This is what political correctness and tolerance has led to. It is madness! In the effort to not offend minorities, national traditions are now made illegal. This is nonsense. Last year, European leaders were waking up to say that multiculturalism has failed. They all targeted the Muslims as the worse offenders. Yet, Europe’s leaders do nothing to correct it. Europe needs to put its foot down and demand that Muslims realize that if they choose to remain in Europe, they assimilate into a Christian culture. They are free to stay and assimilate, or move to Islamic countries if they cannot abide by Europe’s standards.
The European courts will hear this case in the summer. Hopefully, the British people will be outraged by this and find a back bone to stand up to this nonsense. Since England has allowed Shariah courts to be backed by the Government, the Muslim communities are growing stronger and demanding England to become more Islamic. Even though 90% of the British are non-Muslim, they have withdrawn into an attitude of appeasement to these demands. The Brits have seen firsthand the bloodshed that Muslims can bring and continued threats have caused their hearts to faint.
NOTE: All of the above photos were taken in London
Pray for this nation. I believe Britain can take their country back but they have surrendered a lot of ground to Islam and the Muslims are not just going to give it back peacefully. If the Brits continue to cower and appease, we will see an Islamic Europe – Eurabia. I believe that it could happen, even in our lifetime.
Can you imagine the future of America if Islam controls the wealth and weapons of England? Our future in America will be dramatically changed, and Muslims know it.
ByBy Chris Doucette ,Toronto Sun
TORONTO - A Muslim group is urging Canada’s immigration minister to extend his recent burka ban beyond the citizenship courts.
The Muslim Canadian Congress honoured Jason Kenney at a hotel in Toronto’s west end Sunday for his decision to ban burkas during swearing-in ceremonies.
But then the group asked the minister to go a step further and introduce legislation requiring any face coverings be removed to work in the public sector or do business with government officials.
“You have taken a very courageous step in banning the burka from citizenship ceremonies,” Farzana Khan, former MCC president, told the minister.
She then suggested Kenny table a bill similar to Quebec’s Bill 94.
Burkas and niqabs are not only a “security hazard,” they are also symbols of gender inequality and Islamic extremism, Khan said.
“Invoking religious freedoms to conceal one’s identity and promote political ideology is disingenuous,” she said.
Khan and others said women who hide their faces do so for cultural reasons, not religious purposes, so it should not be protected under the country’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
“As Canadian citizens, it is our right to see the faces of the people we deal with in public places,” said MCC Secretary General Tahir Aslam Gora.
After listening to the appeal, the Kenney said the idea sounds good in principle but he’ll need to take a closer look at it.
However, Kenney added his decision to ban burkas at citizenship ceremonies was an easy one and it had the support of 81% of Canadians.
“For me it’s a simple principle,” Kenney said, adding he doesn’t see the ban as controversial.
“People take a public oath publicly,” he said, explaining those who witness the citizenship ceremony should be able to see and hear the new Canadians declaring their allegiance to the country.
Another example of Cultural Jihad.
Can you believe that the picture below was offensive to Muslims????
by Soeren Kern
A Dutch Muslim politician has called for a ban on dogs in The Hague, the third-largest city in the Netherlands.
Islamic legal tradition holds that dogs are “unclean” animals, and some say the call to ban them in Holland and elsewhere represents an attempted encroachment of Islamic Sharia law in Europe.
This latest canine controversy — which the Dutch public has greeted with a mix of amusement and outrage — follows dozens of other Muslim-vs-dog-related incidents in Europe. Critics say it reflects the growing assertiveness of Muslims in Europe as they attempt to impose Islamic legal and religious norms on European society.
The Dutch dustup erupted after Hasan Küçük, a Turkish-Dutch representative on The Hague city council for the Islam Democrats, vehemently opposed a proposal by the Party for the Animals (Partij voor de Dieren) to make the city more dog friendly.
According to a January 28 report in the Amsterdam-based newspaper De Telegraaf, Küçük counter-argued that keeping dogs as pets is tantamount to animal abuse and he then called for the possession of dogs in The Hague to be criminalized.
According to its website, the Islam Democrats [ID] party is “founded on the Islamic principles of justice, equality and solidarity. ID is a bottom-up response to the large gap between the Muslim and immigrant communities and local politics…ID focuses on the political awareness within the Muslim and immigrant communities. Awareness about the need to organize, but also the need for mutual support.”
Paul ter Linden, who represents the Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) on The Hague city council, responded to Küçük by saying: “In this country pet ownership is legal. Whoever disagrees with this should move to another country.”
Dutch political commentators believe Küçük’s declarations are a provocation designed to stir up the Muslim population in The Hague. Muslims — who now make up more than 12% of the city’s population of 500,000 — view dogs as ritually unclean animals and Küçük’s call for a ban on them is a sure vote-getter, they say.
The incident in Holland follows dog-related controversies in other European countries.
In Spain, two Islamic groups based in Lérida — a city in the northeastern region of Catalonia where 29,000 Muslims now make up around 20% of the city’s total population — asked local officials to regulate the presence of dogs in public spaces so they do not “offend Muslims.”
Muslims demanded that dogs be banned from all forms of public transportation including all city buses as well as from all areas frequented by Muslim immigrants. Muslims said the presence of dogs in Lérida violates their religious freedom and their right to live according to Islamic principles.