Fortress of Faith

Christian Apologetics toward Islam and Missions to Muslims

The Obama Administration and Islamic Jihad

Listen to today’s broadcast:

obamaweakToday I want to put the spotlight on the Obama administration and its handling of Islamic jihad. Since Obama was elected he has changed the rules in dealing with Islamic terrorism. All of the professional investigators dealing with homeland security have rewritten the rule book. They have purged the training manuals of the term “Islamic jihadism.” This, and similar terms are no longer allowed when dealing with this subject.

Someone in the government has recently slipped up. They have strayed away from this new dialog required by the Obama administration. This happened on an interview by Candy Crowley on her program State of the Union, which aired on CNN on December 1st.

If you remember, she is the one who hosted one of the presidential debates. She is the one that showed her bias toward President Obama. She corrected some details in the debate and her corrections were themselves incorrect. This caused even liberal pundits to apologize for recommending Candy to do the Presidential debate.

Crowley had a couple of guests. They were the chairpersons of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI). These two sit upon two of the most important committees dealing with intelligence concerning terrorism.

The following is from a transcript of State of the Union from December 1, 2013. You can read the transcript for the entire program here.

Candy CROWLEY: The big question that’s always asked, are we safer now than we were a year ago, two years ago? In general?

FEINSTEIN: I don’t think so. I think terror is up worldwide, the statistics indicate that, the fatalities are way up. The numbers are way up. There are new bombs, very big bombs, trucks being reinforced for those bombs. …… There are more groups than ever and there’s huge malevolence out there.

CROWLEY: So congressman, I have to say, that is not the answer I expected. I expected to hear, oh, we’re safer. Do you agree?

ROGERS: Oh, I absolutely agree that we’re not safer today for the same very reasons.

So the pressure on our intelligence services to get it right to prevent an attack are enormous. And it’s getting more difficult because we see the al Qaeda as we knew it before is metastasizing to something different, more affiliates than we’ve ever had before, meaning more groups that operated independently of al Qaeda have now joined al Qaeda around the world, all of them have at least some aspiration to commit an act of violence in the United States or against western targets all around the world.

They’ve now switched to this notion that maybe smaller events are okay. So if you have more smaller events than bigger events, they think that might still lead to their objectives and their goals. That makes it exponentially harder for our intelligence services to stop an event like that.

Isn’t that interesting? They are telling us that we are not safer than we were before this administration came to power. The actions this administration has take are not making us safer, they are making us more vulnerable. It is a surprise to here someone who is supporter of the Obama administration admit that things are worse.

CROWLEY: Because essentially one person can do a small event.

ROGERS: Absolutely.

CROWLEY: So, one of the things that the senator said was that there is more hatred out there, more — and why is that?

FEINSTEIN: I think there is a real displaced aggression in this very fundamentalist, jihadist, Islamic community. And that is that the west is responsible for everything that goes wrong, and that the only thing that’s going to solve this is Islamic Sharia law and the concept of the caliphate. And I see more groups, more fundamentalists, more jihadists more determined to kill to get to where they want to get. So, it’s not an isolated phenomenon. You see these groups spread a web of connections. And this includes North Africa, it includes the Middle East, it includes other areas as well.

For Feinstein to use these words is the slip up. The administration has purged these words from the political dialog.

What is she saying here? She is saying that the reason the Muslims are more angry and why there is more hatred out there is they blame us for everything that goes wrong. They think that the only solution is the setting up of Sharia law and installing a world wide caliphate.

A caliphate is a dictatorship who rules by the sword like Muhammad did over the Islamic nation. This is the goal of Islam. They want the world under domination of one caliphate.

She says that this is not an isolated phenomenon. These groups spread a web of connections. The picture that she was describing was not a pretty one.

It is interesting that this has come out. It confirms what we have been saying for some time. You won’t hear this in the mainstream media, but I hear this from former FBI trainers who were retired by the Obama administration because the administration did not like Islam being painted as the problem.

Before the Obama administration came in it was very clear who the enemy was and why they were doing what they were doing. It was Islamic jihad terrorism. Islam was at the root of this problem.

The present administration wants to fashion the problem as coming from a radical part of Islam. The don’t want us to know that what is happening is the true teaching of Islam. If you have been following Fortress of Faith for any time you have been taught what the true teachings of Islam are. It is Islam that is responsible for what is happening and it cannot be denied.

The 9/11 Commission Report made this very clear. However, since Obama was elected he has made a concerted effort to purge the fact that Islam is responsible for jihadist terrorism.

Here are some examples of Obama’s PURGING of Islam as being responsible for the Terrorism.

1. Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole declared Wednesday at a conference in Washington that he had “recently directed all components of the Department of Justice to re-evaluate their training efforts in a range of areas, from community outreach to national security.”

http://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/dag/speeches/2011/dag-speech-111019.html

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/21/obama-administration-pulls-references-to-islam-from-terror-training-materials-official-says/

2. 900 Pages purged from training manuals – Removal of words like jihad, Islamic Terrorist

The FBI training manual changed. Nearly 900 pages of training that was considered offensive (to muslims) were deleted. Members like Congressman Allen West, Florida Republican, and Congressman Louie Gohmert, Texas Republican, were critical of the purge.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/10/05/army-instructor-ousted-over-muslim-groups-complaints-about-bigoted-teachings-on-radical-islam-fights-back/

3. James Clapper – Director of National Intelligence described the Muslim Brotherhood as a Secular Organization.

We know that historically they have been a terrorist organization and have birthed other terrorist organizations like Hamas and the Islamic Association of Palestine, etc.

Listen to these last two examples of the Obama administration trying to avoid admitting that Islamic extremism could even be part of the problem.

4. Eric Holder evading the question – Are we at war with Radical Islam

5. Lungren to Sec. Stockton – Assistant Defense Secretary

You need to listen to these last two links to see how hard the officials of the Obama administration try to avoid admitting that Islam, even so called “radical Islam,” has anything to do with the terrorism we see by Muslims around the world. They want to limit terrorism to al-Qaida and no one else.

I’ll have more on this issue tomorrow.

Related Articles

Updated: December 10, 2013 — 4:44 AM
Fortress of Faith © 2015 Frontier Theme