Shooting In San Bernardino
Before I address the main subject I want to say a few things about the shooting in San Bernardino. Last Saturday we were receiving information that this shooting had Middle Eastern connections, but it was still too early to comment on it.
Today we know that the husband was an American citizen and his wife was born in Pakistan. She came here from Saudi Arabia. We know is that this was an Islamic attack. We also know that this was part of a bigger plot. There is no way that these two individuals were the only ones involved. This was not a lone wolf attack. This couple also had a bomb making factory in their home. They had go-pro cameras and filmed the attack.
We instinctively knew this was an Islamic terrorist attack, but it seemed that the government and the media wanted to make it something else. As more information came out we found that these two were Muslim fundamentalists, and had been so for years. They were not radical Muslims, they were true Muslims acting according to the dictates of Islam, following the clear teachings of the Qur’an and the example of their Prophet, Muhammad. They both pledged their allegiance to ISIS.
What Is The White House Doing?
We are hearing and seeing things from the White House and this administration, that we believe, as do others, are acts of treason. These are things that are aiding and abetting the enemy and lessening the security of Americans.
My concern is that this attack is the first of many. There is no way that these two put this together without outside help. This attack was at least an ISIS inspired attack on American soil. This is the largest terrorist attack since 9/11.
We want to focus on what this administration is doing. We are going as far as to say that this is treason at the White House. We are going to lay out our case for this.
President Obama’s speech on Sunday night was only the third time he addressed the nation from the Oval Office in the 7 years he has been in office. At least in this speech he called this what it was, a terrorist attack, although he did avoid saying it was islamic. There are a lot of things that went on in the background to get this press conference to happen.
He made it sound like those who are on the no-fly list are still able to buy a gun in America. My first thought was that if the government deems them a threat to our country, why would we allow them to buy guns? It is not a constitutional right to get on a plane. Obama wants to take away a constitutional right if you are on that no-fly list.
We want security, but we must be careful about throwing our rights away. When we allow government to do certain things, they can use that power on you. Right now we are putting this on extremists, but how do you define extremists? They might call us Christian extremists and put us on the no-fly list. This would allow them to take away our constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
I did some research and I have found that there are people on the no-fly list that shouldn’t be there. They have gone through the channels to get their names removed. They have found that once you are on the no-fly list it is nearly impossible to get your name off. This is a violation of the 4th and 5th amendments that guarantee due process under the law.
We had 14 people gunned down in cold blood and 21 more wounded by Islamic terrorists, and this administrations response is to make it more difficult for law abiding citizens to exercise their 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms. Now that the focus is on terrorism instead of workplace violence, this has become more difficult because we know that the terrorists will use knives, bombs, and anything else to carry out their jihadist attacks.
The response of the President to take away the right to buy guns from those on the no-fly list would not have helped in the San Bernardino attack. These two were not on the no-fly list.
The guns used in this attack were already illegal in California. It didn’t stop them, did it? Gun restrictions only restrict those who obey the law. No gun law has ever stopped a criminal or a terrorist.
Here is the definition of treason from 18 U,S, Code 2381:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
When one is elected to office he puts his hand on the Bible and swears an oath of allegiance. If such a person levies war against the United States, adheres to the enemies of the Untied States, giving them aid and comfort, it is treason.
It is our intention to prove that this administration, particularly the White House, is not only adhering to the ideology of the enemy, it is protecting Islam, giving comfort to Islam, and giving cover for the Islamists. Secondly that they are actually allowing and levying a war against America, directly or indirectly, by not preventing these types of attacks or not allowing law enforcement to do their jobs. Thirdly, they are aiding and comforting those enemies within the United States or elsewhere.
Treason is a serious charge and we are not making this statement lightly. We feel compelled, as citizens looking at the evidence of what is unfolding, that we must inform our followers. We are repeating what happened in th 1930’s and 40’s. At that time the enemy was Hitler, today it is the ideology of Islam. The only difference this time is that the ideology has a god attached to it. That doesn’t make it less evil.
Our leadership, from the top, is aiding and abetting this enemy. This is obvious to those of us who have been studying this for any length of time.
Let’s start by laying out the back story. After the San Bernardino attack, as usual, this administration and the media tried to make this about gun control. Gun control didn’t work because the guns used were already illegal in California. The reason the bad guys are called bad guys is because they don’t obey the laws.
The White House’s narrative was gun control, not Islamic terrorism. Once the FBI established that this was an act of terrorism it apparently sent the White House into a tailspin. We have learned that Obama did not want to give this speech. The White House felt that the FBI had made them look like fools.
Many think that Valarie Jarrett actually runs the White House. She was very upset that the FBI went public with the fact that this was Islamic terrorism.
We are going to stop here for today, but we will pick up here tomorrow.
If we don’t hold our elected officials accountable they will continue doing whatever we let them get away with. For those of you in Canada, many of my Canadian friends have said to me, if America falls to Islam, who will protect the rest of the world.
112total visits,6visits today